BRAZIL: INTENTIONALLY DUMPS WARSHIP WASTE

 

  WHAT IS BRAZIL THINKING OF? HOW CAN A NATION OPERATING WARSHIPS ON THIS SCALE BE ALLOWED TO VILOATE THE HONG KONG CONVENTION WITH CALCULATED INTENT - AND GET AWAY WITH IT

Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site, or sea HOME

 

 

 

 

 

FRANCE 24 FEBRUARY 4 2023 - BRAZIL SINKS WARSHIP IN ATLANTIC DESPITE MARITIME POLLUTION CONCERNS

Brazil on Friday (3rd) sank a decommissioned aircraft carrier, the Navy announced, despite environmental groups claiming the formerly French ship was packed with toxic materials.

The "planned and controlled sinking occurred late in the afternoon" on Friday, some 350 kilometers (220 miles) off the Brazilian coast in the Atlantic Ocean, in an area with an "approximate depth of 5,000 meters (16,000 feet)," the Navy said in a statement.

 

[The depth will make it difficult for investigators to establish how much asbestos in onboard, to be able to calculate a scale of fine, for the intentional pollution of the ocean. This was obviously part of the plan, with malice aforethought.]

The decision to scuttle the six-decade-old Sao Paulo, announced Thursday, came after Brazilian authorities had tried in vain to find a port willing to welcome it.

Though defense officials said they would sink the vessel in the "safest area," environmentalists criticized the decision, saying the aircraft carrier contains tons of asbestos, heavy metals and other toxic materials that could leach into the water and pollute the marine food chain.

The Basel Action Network had called on Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva -- who took office last month vowing to reverse surging environmental destruction under far-right ex-president Jair Bolsonaro -- to immediately halt the "dangerous" plan.

The group issued a joint statement with Greenpeace and Sea Shepherd on Friday, accusing Brazil of having violated "three international treaties" on the environment by sinking the ship, which the NGOs said could cause "incalculable" damage to marine life and coastal communities.

Other "environmentally responsible measures could have been adopted, but once again, the importance of protecting the oceans, which are vital for the life of the planet, was treated with negligence," said Leandro Ramos, director of programs for Greenpeace Brazil.

 

[It is not just negligence, it is a cold hard, calculated criminal act. Once they realised no other country could trust them as to asbestos. Brazil could, and should have arranged for a special location in their own country, to dismantle their outdated warship. Taking all precautions to protect recyclers against asbestos. They did not do so, presumably, because they knew it would be a costly exercise. Where the cheaper option was to ignore the natural law of the sea, and just dump their problem on everyone else - in the long term.]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

'TRAGIC AND REGRETTABLE'

Brazilian authorities said it was better to sink the ship on purpose rather than allow it to sink spontaneously on its own.

The Navy insisted it had chosen a spot for sinking that considered "the security of navigation and the environment" and "the mitigation of the impacts on public health, fishing activities and ecosystems."

A judge overruled a last-minute legal bid to stop the operation, saying in his decision that an unplanned sinking could be even worse for the environment or pose a danger to crews, the G1 news outlet reported.

He called the situation "tragic and regrettable," according to G1.

Built in the late 1950s in France, whose navy sailed it for 37 years as the Foch, the aircraft carrier earned a place in 20th-century naval history.

It took part in France's first nuclear tests in the Pacific in the 1960s, and deployments in Africa, the Middle East and the former Yugoslavia from the 1970s to 1990s.

Brazil bought the 266-meter (873-foot) aircraft carrier for $12 million in 2000. [A bargain, except for the disposal costs. Perhaps there should be a legal requirement for navies to have a recycling plan and deposit scheme for such recycling, before they commission new warships, extending to the purchase of second user warships]

A fire broke out on board in 2005, accelerating the aging ship's decline.

Last year, Brazil authorized Turkish firm Sok Denizcilik to dismantle the Sao Paulo for scrap metal.

But in August, just as a tugboat was about to tow it into the Mediterranean Sea, Turkish environmental authorities blocked the plan.

Brazil then brought the aircraft carrier back but did not allow it into port, citing the "high risk" to the environment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE HONG KONG CONVENTION - RECYCLING OF SHIPS - INCLUDING WARSHIPS

When a ship itself reaches its end of life, almost every part of a ship can be recycled - steel, machinery, equipment, fittings and furniture. Virtually nothing goes to waste and the materials and equipment are almost entirely reused and recycled. Moreover, ship recycling provides direct and secondary employment for thousands of workers, both in the industry itself and in the ancillary markets for materials and components, particularly in the five countries where most of the world’s ship recycling is carried out today – Bangladesh, China, India, Pakistan and Turkey.

IMO has embraced the regulation of ship recycling - not only for ships, but also for land-based recycling facilities - into a single, comprehensive instrument. The International Convention on the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, the so-called Hong Kong Convention, was adopted in 2009.

The Convention embraces the “cradle to grave” concept for the purpose of addressing all environmental and safety aspects relating to ship recycling, taking them into account from the ship design stage onwards and right through to the end of the ship’s life, and including also the responsible management and disposal of associated waste streams in a safe and environmentally sound manner.

When the Hong Kong Convention enters into force, it will provide inclusive and effective standards that can be applied universally. It places responsibilities and obligations on all parties concerned - ship owners, ship building yards, ship recycling facilities, flag States, port States, recycling States, etc. The Convention, the first ever to address ship recycling issues, is aimed at ensuring that ships, when being recycled after reaching the end of their operational lives, do not pose any unnecessary risk to human health and safety or to the environment.

IMO is currently raising awareness of the Convention internationally and in particular is working with recycling countries, to help build the capacity and establish the conditions that will enable them to ratify/accede to the Hong Kong Convention.

 

Clearly though, the IMO has been ineffectual in this case. Navies all over the world will use the sinking of the Sao Paulo as an excuse to dump more toxic waste, in disposable fashion.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/brazil-sinks-warship-in-atlantic-despite-maritime-pollution-concerns/ar-AA176904

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

The IMO's headquarters in London, on the banks of the river Thames & Kitack Lim, Secretary General

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 



SHOULD WARSHIPS BE ALLOWED TO BE TRADED, WITH IRRESPONSIBLE NATIONS?


We imagine that once a nation has shown itself to have acted with disregard for pollution of the international ocean resource, that they should be put onto a black-list of countries that are not allowed to buy large items like warships, from any other arms suppliers.

 

This should also include a ban on sales of aircraft and helicopters, that might be used on aircraft carriers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISPOSABLE - If they have the money to buy a boat or yacht, they have the throwaway cash to responsibly recycle or dispose of the toxic waste that glassfibre boats represent. Boats that are dumped illegally break up into microscopic glass strands and plastics, that shellfish and other seafood ingest, working its way up the food chain to humans. So, look at the yachting and boating fraternity with new eyes. Are they registered with a recognised "end-of-life" scrappage scheme. Does your Government give two figs? If not, elect someone who actually gives a damn. Marinas loaded with gleaming GRP boats, represents death to the ocean, unless properly regulated. Though, boating is a healthy pastime that should be encouraged, and most pleasure craft owners, would want to do the right thing, once, the dangers of fibreglass is explained. The marine leisure market is good for the economy. Whereas, commercial fishing craft and fishermen, need to know all about GRP when deciding on their next boat. Will it be plastic free?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site, or visit our HOMEPAGE

 

 

 

IN LIGHT OF THE CONVENTION FOR THE RECYCLING OF SHIPS, THE ACTIONS BY THE BRAZILIAN NAVY ARE WRECKLESS AND IRRESPONSIBLE - THEY SHOULD BE PROSECUTED TO SET A CASE PRECEDENT, TO PREVENT ANY MORE SIMILAR ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION EVENTS - OF A CALCULATED AND DELIBERATE MANNER

 

This website is Copyright © 2023 Climate Change Trust & Injustice Alliance The views, performance reviews and opinions of the Trust are protected by Articles 18 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.