UNITED NATIONS - HUMAN RIGHTS

  ARTICLE 2 - THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS

Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site, or our HOMEPAGE 

Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948

Article 2.

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3.

 

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION  OF HUMAN RIGHTS

 

Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5

Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 Article 10

Article 11 Article 12 Article 13 Article 14 Article 15

Article 16 Article 17 Article 18 Article 19 Article 20

Article 21 Article 22 Article 23 Article 24 Article 25

Article 26 Article 27 Article 28 Article 29 Article 30

 

 

 



 

 

ARTICLE 2 VIOLATION EXAMPLE - In the United Kingdom, the law was changed to obtain as many convictions as possible against asylum seekers, while also limiting the funding of any defence, to the point where any accusation against an asylum seeker of a sexual nature would result in deportation.

 

In addition to these changes brought in by David Blunkett, the police, in what appears to be routine failures to properly investigate and secure a crime scene, may be helping the state with a secret agenda to increase the number of deportations and decrease prison populations. All aimed at violating the human rights of those targeted by the Crown Prosecution Service.

 

One case in particular has come to our attention where Dr Elizabeth Carter was a witness for the state concerning an allegation of date rape where the accused was held to have had oral and vaginal sex with a woman who was over the alcohol limit. The Sussex police failed to secure the crime scene in not freezing a urine sample against further fermentation by a yeast infection, that meant the sample was increasing in alcohol content before the results were passed to Elizabeth Carter for inclusion in her evidence statement.

 

Where the alcohol was already on the low scale, the increase in alcohol because of the impropriety on the part of the investigating officers, meant that the conviction was obtained by fraudulent means and is therefore unsafe.

 

We believe that the officer who failed to follow the correct procedure, knew what he was doing, with the intention of getting the asylum seeker deported. This was because the nationality of the defendant was Iranian.

 

The defence did not find out about the deception on the part of the Sussex police until the trial was in progress.

 

 

 

 



 

 

This website is Copyright © 2021 Climate Change Trust & Injustice Alliance The views, performance reviews and opinions of the Trust are protected by Articles 18 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.