COP OUT, FLOP 26 - UN CLIMATE CRIMINALS
HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES - After World War II, rules were drawn up to form the United Nations: 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights.' This was triggered by the atrocities committed by all sides, but chiefly by Nazi Germany, using concentration camps and industrial scale gassing, as part of their eugenics programme of ethnic cleansing, coupled with Lebensborn. After the hostilities ceased, trials were held and those convicted as war criminals were hanged.
Lebensborn (literally: "Fount of Life") was an SS-initiated, state-supported, registered association in Nazi Germany with the goal of raising the birth rate of Aryan children of people classified as 'racially pure' and 'healthy' based on Nazi racial hygiene and health ideology. Lebensborn provided welfare to its mostly unmarried mothers, encouraged anonymous births by unmarried women at their maternity homes, and mediated adoption of these children by likewise 'racially pure' and 'healthy' parents, particularly SS members and their families. The Cross of Honour of the German Mother was given to the women who bore the most Aryan children. Abortion was legalised (and, more commonly, endorsed) by the Nazis for disabled and non-Germanic children, but strictly punished otherwise. This completed the mass production of humans on the one hand, and disposal (holocaust) on the other. Climate criminals may be once removed, but no less culpable.
A Nazi war criminal is a person who kills an unarmed human being or gives the order to kill another human being outside the normal rules of engagement in times of war.
In peacetime, a Climate Change Criminal, is a politician, industrialist or other entity that conducts themselves and/or their policies such as to (in effect) murder another human being from starvation or poisoning resulting from action or inaction on their part, and including dumping plastic in the sea to make fish toxic.
This philosophy extends to causing hardship and mental stress (torture), contrary to Articles 2 and 3 of the EU's Human Rights Convention and Articles 3 and 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Countries that pursue anti climate-cooling policies are the nasties of politics: Climate Nazis. This includes any world leader who is more interested in making money for and from their country, than saving the planet from global warming, and safeguarding the people, flora and fauna in their geographical region.
WHO IS THE CLIMATE ENEMY NUMBER 1 ?
Ranked in order of harm to the planet, and/or failure to implement policy change, offenders include Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, Scott Morrison, Jair Bolsonaro and Narendra Modi, with Boris Johnson bringing up the rear, but with the UK so small a country, hardly worth a mention - except for Queen Elizabeth, Prince Charles and the Duke of Cambridge, royal influence on the Commonwealth nations.
In the fight against climate change the 'Dirty Dozen' are the new war criminals, that will be held accountable during any future trials for operating unethically, in violating the right to life free of mental torture and degrading treatment, hence in denial of the minority countries who are suffering as a result of their brutal development politics.
The cure is not to placate these dictators, but to strangle their anti-social economic activities, one example of which is by not trading with them. We need to make them climate outcasts. Raise a Climate Curtain. There is no need to go to war like that forced on the Allies during World War Two, unless there is absolutely no alternative. I.e. if for example China and India keep on escalating coal use - in the full knowledge that their actions are human rights abuses.
As in World War 2, we'd need a land army, to grow crops and factories to make replacements for goods the climate Nazis might have exported to us. Or, we could seek alternative suppliers from countries that operate sustainable policies, such as tree planting, rather than tree clearing as in Brazil. The planting of trees on a big scale is a must.
What chance have we? We doubt the Dirty Dozen (members of the G20) will be able to change, so entrenched are they in over-borrowing and debt from kleptocratic agendas - meaning COP 26 will be FLOP26, leading to FLOP27, with COP28 to follow, and so on. Hence, lending and borrowing needs to be strictly controlled, such as not to overburden the planet.
Policies need to change significantly, to tax coal and oil, so making it economically intolerable for end users, thus bringing in solar and wind power renewables, for green electrification of transport, using subsidies, or tax holidays - or whatever. Regardless, of the reduction in tax income. We don't need goods made in countries that are burning coal, to be able to sell us cheap products. The products are not cheap. They are climate expensive.
Help us to help you get the message across, by voting with your wallets. Please do not buy anything from the big coal burning and exporting nations.
COP OUT 28 DIRTY DOZEN - IN ORDER OF CO2, METHANE GLOBAL % VOLUME & COAL FIRED INSANITY
COP 26 FLOP DIRTY DOZEN - IN ORDER OF CO2, METHANE AND COAL FIRED INSANITY
UNITED NATIONS IPCC CODE RED - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the United Nations body for assessing the science related to climate change - has declared a Code Red, we wonder how that equated to the Defense Readiness Condition, better known as the "Defcon" system, in terms of war footing. The climate criminals are already murdering hundreds of thousands of people in the displacement from desertification, and subjecting others to degrading and inhuman treatment. There is little difference between the ethnic cleansing (via gas chambers) carried out in Nazi Germany during World War Two, to industrialize human slaughter, and frying the planet - that kills many more victims. Surely, the present use of polluting coal to generate electricity, is leading us into a World War Three situation!
In effect the developing nations are
blackmailing the developed nations. If you don't pay us not to use coal
(the black stuff) we'll not only keep on using it, but increase our
usage. Whereas, the developing nations have the chance to build clean as
they develop, rather than build in desertification and food insecurity,
into their societal development. Madness! But that is what Brazil, China
and India appear to be intent on.
This website is Copyright © 2021 Climate Change Trust & Injustice Alliance The views, performance reviews and opinions of the Trust are protected by Articles 18 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.